Three elements of our intellectual tradition has been owned by the ambiguous relationship between standards. First, the assumption goes back to Bentham, the property law is a pure creature. (1) an institution that is entirely dependent on its existence to the law is unlikely to be infused with strong moral content. Second related to a utilitarian approach of Bentham tradition is to examine issues of property rights. (2) pragmatism, of course, a moral theory. But the theory of prices and cost-benefit analysis, a largely individual rights and equal justice, which many consider the hallmark of a basic ethical perspective to frame indifferent to questions of modern applications. Third, in the tradition of academic circles in the popular mind, maybe more, this property is associated with immorality. , Is the subject of Proudhon that "property is theft" with (3) and his call for the abolition of private property with the construction of Marx and Engels, this tradition (4) Keep in mind to protect those who mentioned through the public system drawn from an ethical point of view.

This essay attempts to prove doubters wrong, and moral challenge that ownership away. We hope to establish two sets. First, there is no system of property rights to survive, the property is steeped in moral sense. For this, we mean that the distinguishing feature of a system of ownership - owner of the legal guardian of the matter is the exclusive property of acting - as a moral law, intentional violation of this right should be viewed against, attacks licensed by either of the things that you take possession of property without the consent or things, must be regarded as immoral acts. Secondly, the modern American legal system, property in relation to this key aspect at least, in fact, take a moral perspective.

Our claim to the property on the following key aspects: the property is a coordination of things personal and impersonal interactions. Consequently, property rights, a broad and diverse group of potential offenders, these rights should really be reported. (5) property rights in order to coordinate the behavior of a large number of outsiders, since, it is easy to understand and should be opposed to misinterpretation. Law, including criminal prosecution and civil enforcement actions, almost certainly to achieve this degree of coordination and compliance is not enough. Building barricades and setting self-help such as guards, almost universal respect for property rights to provide the desired degree weak.

The moral act is based on a real system of coordinates in real estate as simple and should be accessible to all members of the community. No attempt here to outline the theory of the origin of property. We argue that the kind of moral basis to rest on the set important restrictions that require real coordination. Here too, the moral content of a fully developed theory. However, it is highly unlikely that there are moral seems trapped by the many forms of utilitarianism. Practicality is very uncertain, and the special case of cost-benefit is very challenging and error-prone, the property of a system of solid and widely accepted understanding of the moral support.

The process of moral obligations it impossible to keep a simple system for everyone to understand. Regardless of the rights of everyday morality is based on a simple core support, property law is not expected to be the creature. Necessary connection between morality and wealth if we are correct about, it almost certainly arises entirely from Bentham evil Property Law